Mark Patterson currently serves as the Deputy Compact Administrator for the Oregon Department of Corrections. Mark oversees the Compact operations for Oregon’s 36 Counties, as well as the Earned Discharge, Family Alternative Leave and Short Term Trans Leave programs for the ODOC. Mark is currently serving as the West Region Chair for the DCA Liaison committee for the Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision. Mark has been serving in the DCA position for over 7 years and prior to this role was a Prison Term Analyst.
The legal environment for Compacts involves an amalgamation of Compact texts and case law from federal and state courts throughout the country. Because there are relatively few court decisions establishing legal principles in any particular court or for any particular Compact, courts frequently consider other federal and state court decisions for their interpretation and application of a Compact. Courts also use the texts of other Compacts and corresponding case law for generally applicable principles of Compact law. Given complexity of the legal underpinnings and the pervasive and appropriate use of Compacts today, it is important for judges and court personnel to understand the law of interstate Compacts.
As noted in the introduction and explained in this chapter, interstate Compacts are not mere agreements between the states subject to parochial interpretations or selective application. On their face, they are statutory contracts that bind member states including respective agencies, officials, and citizens to an agreed set of principles and understandings. They are not a series of recommended procedures or easily disregarded discretionary proposals of convenience. Moreover, they are not uniform, model, or suggested state laws, nor are they administrative agreements between agencies or executive officials. Understanding the unique significance of interstate Compacts in the American legal system is an important predicate to correct application of Compact terms and conditions that may prevent legal jeopardy vis-à-vis fulfilling its contractual obligations.
